Tax day. Be nice if it was not spent on war and political favors pockets.
But, it is a nice day here at the bottom of East Texas, people and plants raging with energy.
Someone at Flickr brought up the question: illustration vs "art". If a painting/drawing etc is being used to sell something, then I suppose it is "commercial" art. But if some artists paint/draw in a narrative and/or graphic style.....that is not commercial or illustration art, it is a simple choice of subject. Andy Warhol never shirked the title of commercial art....no one could have been more commercial.....but in his challenge to regimented contemporary (at the time) art thinking, he turned things upside down in the art world and the museums. So, signs are art, marks on walls are art, neon bar signs are art, your kid's art is art. Its all art, in my opinion, unless it is hawking perfume, etc. A case might be made for artists hawking galleries and curators, but that is another subject.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The web pages of some very good artists.
- roger lee's sculpture
- professor art, reflections on life and the creative process
- mark adams
- somethings i think about- annell livingstone
- harry stooshinoff
- banner mountain textiles
- http://jeane-artit.blogspot.com
- katherine treffinger
- cecilia levy
- andy feehan
- mallory arts
- andre fromont
- richard russell
- susan rudat
- michael rohde
- HJ bott
- made in mississippi
- lydia bodnar balahutrak
- tim glover
- kelly moran
Followers
Popular Posts
-
....I'm totally out of Indian Village rag paper to paint my gouaches on!!!!!!! I am combing the Internet trying to find something that...
-
This has nothing to do with painting, except that it has been one of my subjects for the last 35 years. The painful subject is relationsh...
-
I sit here in a comfy house with my chin in my hand....well, my hand is busy with the other one at this moment as I'm not a hunt and pec...
-
Well. Lots has transpired since I last posted. My mother died and thus endeth my monthly trips to California to look after her. She was 9...
-
Paintings all off to the gallery. The studio echos. Well, sort of. Actually, there is a LOT of stuff in there. It is good to be producti...
-
I need to write again. This time about something that really matters. My mother is 2000 miles away, 90 in Feb, living alone, doing very we...
-
We have been lucky with rain this summer....the trees live! No taking it for granted though. Only have to look northward to see drought a...
-
Sunday morning. Mother's day. Everyone sweet. J had a little pile of something on the counter for me where I would find it. My walle...
-
Just saw Olivia Newton John on the bbc Graham Norton show. I have to spout. He is so funny, do love him. But. Much comment on how great...
folk art and other tasty bits
more stuff:
http://flickr.com/photos/siptak
http://gailsiptak.com
http://koelschgallery.com
http://gailsiptak.com
http://koelschgallery.com
About Me
- Gail Siptak
- I am living and painting in the little town of Houston. A far way from my San Francisco beginnings. I paint what I see of the human condition, be it human, animal or object. The glimmer of humor, pathos, and spirit in so much of what I see is the basis of what I paint.
copyright
All content here is under copyright: Gail Siptak. Please ask for permission if you wish to use them. Thanks.
Firstly: I love your drawings and paintings - fabulous!
ReplyDeleteSecondly - this whole art v illustration thing is for me simply a product of how we view art in the current climate: historically almost all art was illustration - of the bible, of the Greek myths etc, later came commissioned portraits, landscapes and in the 19thC the rise of the individual (which of course coincides with the industrial revolution and the rise of mechanical reproduction)which leads to the rise of individual expression and the idea of 'the artist' as we now know it. This is the argument I always put forward if ever anyone argues illustration is 'not' art...
That's a good way to put it, Sarah, I agree.
ReplyDelete